Powered By Blogger
Showing posts with label YSR Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label YSR Congress. Show all posts

Monday, 12 December 2011

Jupudi feeling the heat

The few leaders from Congress, who continue to be with Jagan Mohan Reddy’s YSR Congress Party, are feeling the heat. With the ruling party bent on punishing even the four MLCs loyal to Jagan, these leaders feel cornered. Jupudi Prabhakara Rao, nominated MLC, is one such staunch follower of Jagan who finds himself on tenterhooks.
The dalit leader of Mala Mahanadu was encouraged by the late YSR, who made him MLC by getting him nominated through the Governor. He has been with Jagan from day one, but sources close to him say that the former Central government employee is going through financial constraints.
Jagan, as is known by now, never bothered to take care of his needs, and the MLC’s only source of income is what he gets as salary and perks in his official position. That has been barely enough, since where ever he goes, the dalits throng him and even organizing small meeting with them has become an expensive affair, his followers say.
Now with the threat of disqualification looming large, Jupudi is getting nervous. He still hopes that as Governer’s nominee, he might escape the dragnet on technical grounds. But if his disqualification becomes inevitable, the dalit leader fears that he will be left in the lurch for a long time to come.
How to sustain for another two-and-a-half years politically with no income and without Jagan’s help – not forthcoming anyway – is now the troublesome question bothering Jupudi Prabhakara Rao.

Friday, 9 December 2011

Jagan Resumes Attack On Sonia!


YSR Congress party president Y S Jaganmohan Reddy, who has been maintaining restraint on attacking the Congress party at the Centre for quite some time, resumed the attack again on Thursday.
Addressing a gathering as part of his Odarpu Yatra in Guntur district, Jagan said Congress president Sonia Gandhi was able to run the UPA government at the Centre only because of the efforts of his father Y S Rajasekhara Reddy in the state.
“If not for the hard work of YSR in 2004 and 2009, Sonia Gandhi would not have been in this position,” he said.
However, Jagan did not make stronger comments against Sonia, but according to political observers, he might step up attack on her in the coming days.
Apparently, Jagan is emboldened by the support of 18 MLAs and the outcome of the Bellary bypoll result. He is perhaps of the view that he would still emerge as victorious in the elections despite the CBI inquiry against him.
All these days, there was a talk that Jagan had stopped criticizing Sonia Gandhi as part of his compromise with the central leadership of the Congress party following the CBI inquiry.

Thursday, 8 December 2011

Jagan strength surprises parties

వై.ఎస్.ఆర్.కాంగ్రెస్ అధ్యక్షుడు జగన్మోహన్ రెడ్డి ఎంతమంది ఎమ్మెల్యేలను నిలబెట్టుకుంటారని కాంగ్రెస్ , టిడిపి ముఖ్యనేతలు భావించారు? పద్దెనిమిది మంది ఎమ్మెల్యేలను నిలబెట్టుకోవడంపై వారు ఎలా స్పందిస్తున్నారు? అవిశ్వాస తీర్మానంపై చర్చ రసపట్టుకు చేరుకున్నప్పుడు ఒక దశలో శాసనసభ ప్రాంగణంలో తెలుగుదేశం, కాంగ్రెస్ ముఖ్యనేతలు జగన్ కు మద్దతు ఇస్తున్నవారి సంఖ్య సింగిల్ డిజిట్ కుపడిపోయిందని భావించారు. తెలుగుదేశం ముఖ్యనేత ఒకరైతే జగన్ బలం ఐదారుకన్నా ఉండదని తనకు సమాచారం వచ్చిందని అన్నారట. అది కూడా వైఎస్ విజయమ్మతోపాటు, బాలినేని శ్రీనివాసరెడ్డి, మేకపాటి చంద్రశేఖరరెడ్డి, కడప జిల్లాకు చెందిన ఒకరిద్దరు మాత్రమే మిగులుతారని వారు భావించారు. కాంగ్రెస్ ముఖ్యనేతలు సైతం ఇదే మాదిరి పదిలోపే ఉంటుందని అనుకున్నారు.అయితే రాజ్యసభ సభ్యుడు కెవిపి రామచంద్రరావు మాత్రం జగన్ కు మద్దతు ఇచ్చేవారి సంఖ్య పదిహేడు వరకు ఉండవచ్చని లెక్కగట్టారు. అయినప్పట్టికీ చివరివరకు అంతమంది ఉండకపోవచ్చని కాంగ్రెస్ నేతలు అనుకున్నారు. కాని విజయమ్మతో సహా పందొమ్మిది మంది ఎమ్మెల్యేలు జగన్ కు మద్దతు ఇచ్చారని తేలడంతో ఒక్కసారే ఆశ్చర్యపోయారట. తమకైతే ఒక్కసారే ఉలిక్కి పడినట్లయిందని తెలుగుదేశం నాయకుడు ఒకరు వ్యాఖ్యానించారు. డెబ్బైమంది ఎమ్మెల్యేలు ఉంటారని జగన్ గతంలో చెప్పిన పాయింటు ఆధారంగా తాము విమర్శలు చేసినా, పద్దెనిమిది మంది ఎమ్మెల్యేలు జగన్ కు మద్దతు ఇవ్వడం కచ్చితంగా తమను ఆలోచింపచేసేదే అయిందని ఆయన అన్నారు. అలా గే కాంగ్రెస్ నేతలు సైతం ఈ పరిణామానికి ఉలిక్కిపడ్డారు.అందువల్లనే ఇప్పుడు వారిపై అనర్హత వేటు వేయడానికి వెనుకా,ముందు అయ్యే పరిస్థితి వచ్చిందని వ్యాఖ్యానిస్తున్నారు. ధైర్యంగా కాంగ్రెస్ నేతలు తాము విప్ ఉల్లంఘించినవారిపై అనర్హత వేటు వేయబోతున్నామని ధైర్యంగా చెప్పలేకపోతున్నారని చెబుతున్నారు. ఉప ఎన్నికలు వస్తే ఎదురయ్యే ఇబ్బందులను దృష్టిలో ఉంచుకునే వారు ఇలా వ్యవహరిస్తున్నారని భావిస్తున్నారు.

అవిశ్వాసంతో బయటపడ్డ పార్టీల బలాబలాలు

కిరణ్ కుమార్ రెడ్డి ప్రభుత్వంపై వచ్చిన అవిశ్వాస తీర్మానం వీగిపోయిన తీరు ప్రభుత్వానికి బలాన్ని ఇచ్చిందా? ప్రభుత్వ బలహీనత బయటపడిందా?తెలుగుదేశం పార్టీ రాజకీయంగా ముందడుగు వేసిందా?లేక ఆ పార్టీకి ప్రత్యేకమైన లాభం రాలేదా? వై.ఎస్.ఆర్.కాంగ్రెస్ పార్టీ గతంలో చెప్పిన మాటలకు ,ఆ పార్టీకి లభించిన మద్దతుకు పొంతన లేకపోవడం నష్టం తెచ్చిందా?మొత్తం రాష్ట్రంలో రాజకీయ పరిస్థితులలోఏర్పడిన గజిబిజిలో స్పష్టత వచ్చిందా అన్నది పరిశీలించడం ఆసక్తికరమైన అంశంగా ఉంటుంది. ముందుగా ముఖ్యమంత్రి కిరణ్ కుమార్ రెడ్డికి అవిశ్వాస తీర్మానం లో స్వల్ప ఆధిక్యత తోనైనా గట్టెక్కడం ఆయనకు ఊపిరి పీల్చుకున్నట్లయింది.కచ్చితంగా కిరణ్ కూడా జగన్ వర్గం ఎమ్మెల్యేలను ఆకర్షించడంలో తనదైన శైలిలో కృషి చేశారు.కొందరు ముఖ్యమైన జగన్ మద్దతుదారులు అనపర్తి ఎమ్మెల్యే శేషారెడ్డి, కాకినాడ సిటి ఎమ్మెల్యే ద్వారం పూడి చంద్రశేఖరరెడ్డి వంటివారినే కాకుండా కడప జిల్లాకే చెందిన జమ్మలమడుగు ఎమ్మెల్యే ఆదినారాయణరెడ్డిని కిరణ్ ఆకర్షించడం ద్వారా జగన్ పై కిరణ్ తన ఆధిక్యతను ప్రదర్శించుకోగలిగారు. ఒకప్పుడు కాంగ్రెస్ నుంచి నలభై నుంచి ఏభై వరకు కచ్చితంగా ఎమ్మెల్యేలు వెళ్లిపోతారనుకున్న పరిస్థితి నుంచి ఇరవైలోపునకే తగ్గించడంలో కిరణ్ కుమార్ రెడ్డి సఫలం అయ్యారనే అనుకోవాలి. కాని అదే సమయంలో అధికారాన్ని వదలిపెట్టుకుని కూడా ఒక వ్యక్తి వెనుక ఇంతమంది ఎమ్మెల్యేలు ఉండడం అంటే అది కూడా కాంగ్రెస్ పార్టీ బలహీనతగానే పరిగణించాలి. అందుకు ముఖ్యమంత్రి కిరణ్ కుమార్ రెడ్డి ఎంతవరకు బాధ్యుడన్న ప్రశ్న రావచ్చు. పిసిసి అధ్యక్షుడు బొత్స ఎంతవరకు కారకుడన్న ప్రశ్న ఉత్పన్నం కావచ్చు.అది వేరే విషయం.సాధారణంగా అధికారాన్ని వదలి వెళ్లడానికి ఈరోజులలో ఇష్టపడరు.అలాంటిది ఏకంగా పదహారు మంది కాంగ్రెస్ ఎమ్మెల్యేలు, ఒక ప్రజారాజ్యం ఎమ్మెల్యే కాంగ్రెస్ ను కాదని జగన్ పార్టీకి మద్దతుగా నిలబడడాన్ని తక్కువగా కాంగ్రెస్ పార్టీ అంచనా వేయజాలదు. ఒక దశలో కేవలం ఐదారుగురు ఎమ్మెల్యేలే ఉంటారని కాంగ్రెస్ వ్యూహకర్తలు అంచనావేశారు.తుది ఫలితం వచ్చేసరికి అది తప్పని తేలింది.అయితే ఇప్పుడు అవిశ్వాస తీర్మానం విప్ ను ఉల్లంఘించిన వారిపై వేటు వేయాలా? వద్దా అన్న సంశయం కాంగ్రెస్ లో నెలకొంది. అంటే దీనిని కచ్చితంగా కాంగ్రెస్ బలహీనతగానే తీసుకోవాలి.మామూలుగా అయితే ఈసరికి అనర్హత వేటు వేయడానికి స్పీకర్ కు ఫిర్యాదు పత్రాన్ని సిద్దం చేయాలి. కాని అలా చేయలేకపోవడం కాంగ్రెస్ నిస్సహాయ పరిస్థితిగానే భావించాలి. ప్రజారాజ్యం, ఎమ్.ఐ.ఎమ్. మద్దతు లేకపోతే కాంగ్రెస్ ప్రభుత్వం గట్టెక్కడం కష్టం అయ్యేదన్నది సందేహాలకు అతీతంగా రుజువు అయింది.ఇప్పుడు కిరణ్ ప్రభుత్వాన్ని నిలబెట్టిన ఘనత తనదేనని ప్రజారాజ్యం మాజీ అధినేత , మెగాస్టార్ చిరంజీవి క్లెయిమ్ చేస్తారు.దానికి కాంగ్రెస్ కూడా అంగీకరించకతప్పదు. కాంగ్రెస్ అధిష్టానంలో చిరంజీవికి కాస్త వెయిట్ పెరుగుతుంది. కిరణ్, బొత్సల కన్నా, ఇప్పుడు చిరంజీవికి అధిష్టానం ఎక్కువ ప్రాధాన్యం ఇవ్వవచ్చు.ఏతావాతా కిరణ్ ప్రభుత్వం నిలబడడం ఆయనకు మేలు కలిగించిన అంశం అయితే, చిరంజీవికి డిమాండ్ పెరగడం ముఖ్యమైన అంశంగా తీసుకోవాలి. ఇదే సమయంలో కిరణ్ ప్రభుత్వం సుస్థిరంగా రాజకీయ సంక్షోభాలేవి లేకుండా నడుస్తుందా అన్న ప్రశ్నలు తలెత్తుతాయి.అది కిరణ్ వ్యవహార శైలిపై ఆధారపడి ఉంటుంది. ఇందులో కొన్ని కష్టాలు ఇబ్బందులు తప్పవు. ఎమ్మెల్యేల డిమాండ్లను , కోర్కెల చిట్టాను నెరవేర్చవలసిన బాధ్యత కిరణ్ పై పడుతుంది. ఈ క్రమంలో కొన్ని తప్పులు జరగవచ్చు. ఒకవైపు ఎమ్మెల్యేలను కాపాడుకుంటూ, మరో వైపు ప్రజాక్షేత్రంలో అప్రతిష్టపాలు కాకుండా చూసుకోవలసిన బాధ్యత కిరణ్ పై పడుతుంది. ఇక మంత్రి వర్గ విస్తరణకు కాస్త అనుకూల వాతావరణం ఏర్పడినా, కిరణ్ పై విపరీతమైన ఒత్తిడి పెరుగుతుంది.దానిని తట్టుకుని , తనకు ఇష్టం లేని కొందరు మంత్రులను తొలగించి , ఇష్టైమైన వారిని వేసుకోవడానికి అధిష్టానం అనుమతించాల్సి ఉంటుంది.ఇవన్ని కూడా కిరణ్ కుమార్ రెడ్డికి భవిష్యత్తులో
ఎదురయ్యే సవాళ్లనే చెప్పాలి.అనర్హత వేటు విషయంలో ముందుకు వెళితే వాటన్నిటికి ఉప ఎన్నికలు వస్తాయి. అది కిరణ్ కు ప్రధాన పరీక్ష అవుతుంది. అనర్హత వేటు వేయకపోయినా, వేసినా, రెండు కూడా కిరణ్ కు పరీక్షలే అవుతాయని చెప్పాలి. అయితే వీటిని అధిగమించి, కిరణ్ కుమార్ రెడ్డి కనుక ఉప ఎన్నికలలోమెజార్టీ స్థానాలు తెచ్చుకోగలిగితే ఆయనకు తిరుగు ఉండదు. అలాకాకపోతే మాత్రం రాజకీయంగా కష్టాలు ఎదుర్కోవలసి ఉంటుంది.మొత్తం మీద కిరణ్ ప్రభుత్వం బలం ఏమిటో, బలహీనత ఏమిటో ఈ అవిశ్వాస పరీక్ష స్పష్టంగా బయటపెట్టిందని చెప్పవచ్చు.
ఇక తెలుగుదేశం అధినేత చంద్రబాబు నాయుడు అవిశ్వాస పరీక్ష ఒక రకంగా తనపై రాజకీయంగా వచ్చిన అభియోగాలను క్లియర్ చేసుకవడానికి ఉపయోగపడిందని చెప్పాలి. అయితే ఆరు నెలల క్రితం సభలో అవిశ్వాస పరీక్ష వచ్చేలా చేయకుండా,తర్వాత పరిస్థితులు మారాక సిద్దం అయ్యారని విమర్శలు వచ్చినా, ఏ రాజకీయపార్టీ అయినా తనసొంత ప్రయోజనాలకు అనుగుణంగా వ్యవహరిస్తుంది కాని, వేరేపార్టీలు చెప్పినట్లు చేయదు కదా.అంతవరకు చంద్రబాబు ఇబ్బంది పడలేదు. అయితే ఒక వేళ నిజంగానే విప్ ఉల్లంఘించిన కాంగ్రెస్ ఎమ్మెల్యేలను అనర్హులను చేస్తే అప్పుడు టిడిపికి కూడా పరీక్ష అవుతుంది. ప్రధానంగా ఇటీవలి సర్వేలలో టిడిపి పరిస్థితి కూడా అంత సజావుగా లేదన్న సమాచారం వస్తున్న నేపధ్యంలో వీరికి కూడా సహజంగానే ఆందోళన కలుగుతుంది.ప్రత్యేకించి తెలంగాణలో ఇంకా టిడిపి కోలుకుందని చెప్పేపరిస్థితి కనబడడం లేదు. కాంగ్రెస్ కు తామే ప్రదాన పోటీ అన్న నమ్మకాన్ని కలిగించగలిగితేనే టిడిపికి ఉపయోగం ఉంటుంది.అయితే చంద్రబాబుకుగాని, టిడిపికి గాని అవిశ్వాస పరీక్ష వ్యవహారం కన్నా సిబిఐ విచారణే ముఖ్యమైన అంశంగా గమనించాలి.దాని నుంచి క్షేమంగా బయటపడితే అప్పుడు టిడిపి బాగా పుంజుకోలుగుతుంది.
వై.ఎస్.ఆర్.కాంగ్రెస్ అధ్యక్షుడు జగన్మోహన్ రెడ్డికాని, ఆయన పార్టీ నేతలు నిజానికి ఈ అవిశ్వాస తీర్మానం ఓటింగులో తమ బలాన్ని చాటుకోవడంలో విఫలమైనట్లే లెక్క. అత్యంత సన్నిహితులను కూడా కోల్పోవడం కొంత వరకు నష్టమైనని చెప్పాలి.యాజమాన్య నిర్వహణ సరిగా లేదన్న వ్యాఖ్యలు ఆ పార్టీ నేతల నుంచే వస్తున్నాయి.జగన్ ఓదార్పు యాత్రలోనే ఎక్కువగా కొనసాగడం, ఎమ్మెల్యేలతో నిరంతరం టచ్ లో లేకపోవడం వంటి లోపాలను ఆ పార్టీ నేతలు ప్రస్తావిస్తున్నారు. చివరి నిమిషంలో జగన్ రంగంలో దిగి తన బలాన్ని పందొమ్మిదిగా చూపించుకోవడం ద్వారా అవిశ్వాస తీర్మానం ఓడిపోయినా, జగన్ కు ఇప్పటికీ ఇంత బలం ఉందా అన్న అభిప్రాయం రావడంతో ఆయన పరిస్థితి మరీ దెబ్బతినలేదని చెప్పాలి. ఆయనపార్టీ నాయకులు కిందపడ్డా తమదే పైచేయి అనడానికి ప్రయత్నిస్తున్నారు.జగన్ కూడా దమ్ముంటే ఈ పదిహేడు నియోజకవర్గాలకు ఒకేసారి ఎన్నికలు పెట్టాలని సవాలు విసరడం ద్వారా జనానికి తనపై విశ్వాసం కోల్పోకుండా జాగ్రత్తపడుతున్నారని అనుకోవాలి.అయితే ఏమాటకామాట ఒప్పుకోవాలి. ఎవరైనా ఎమ్మెల్యేలను ఆయన కట్టడి చేయకుండా అవిశ్వాసానికి ఓటు వేసేవారే తన మనుషులని ధైర్యంగా చెప్పిన తీరును మాత్రం మెచ్చుకోవాలి.కాని అదే సమయంలో తొలి నుంచి ఉన్న సుమారు నలభై మంది ఎమ్మెల్యేలను నిలబెట్టుకోవడంలో సఫలం కాకపోవడం కారణం ఏదైనా ఆయన బలహీనతగా పరిగణించాలి.అనకాపల్లి ఎమ్.పి సబ్బం హరి ఎప్పుడూ అవిశ్వాసం పెడితే సత్తా చూపుతామని, ప్రభుత్వం పడిపోతుందని చెబుతూ వచ్చేవారు. అలాంటివారికి ఈ పరిణామం కాస్త ఇబ్బందికరమే. అయినప్పట్టికీ ఇక ప్రజాక్షేత్రంలోనే తేల్చుకుంటానికి జగన్ సిద్దం అవడం కూడా మంచిదే.ఉప ఎన్నికలు జరిగి తన పక్షానికి అత్యధిక సీట్లు వస్తే ఇక భవిష్యత్తులో జగన్ రాష్ట్ర రాజకీయాలను శాసించబోతున్నట్లే లెక్క. అలా కాకుండా తక్కువ సీట్లకే పరిమితమైతే అప్పుడు జగన్ భవిష్యత్తు డోలాయమానంలో పడుతుంది. ఇక టిఆర్ఎస్ పార్టీ కి ఈ అవిశ్వాసం పెద్దగా లాభం కాని, నష్టం కాని తేలేదు. కాకపోతే తెలంగాణకు చెందిన ఇతర పార్టీ ల నేతలను అవిశ్వాసానికి అనుకూలంగా చేయడంలో సఫలం కాలేకపోయారు.అయితే ఉప ఎన్నికలు వస్తే తమ సత్తాను తెలంగాణలో చాటాలని ఆ పార్టీ ఉవ్విళ్లూరుతోంది. అయితే అసలు ఉప ఎన్నికలు వస్తాయో , రాని తెలియని పరిస్థితి నెలకొంది.ఏది ఏమైనా అన్ని ప్రధాన రాజకీయ పార్టీల బలాబలాలను అవిశ్వాస తీర్మానం బహిర్గతం చేసిందని చెప్పుకోవాలి.                            

Friends in need??

Forced friendship?
What is the understanding between KCR and Jagan? The question has popped up once again following Chiranjeevi’s allegation over his MLAs being lured by YSR Congress Party during the no-confidence motion in the Assembly recently.
Chiranjeevi alleged that Jagan had tried to win over the support of some of his MLAs with the promise of giving his party tickets in case of disqualification. “Jagan even assured them that he could get TRS Party tickets if they preferred to contest from that party,” the PRP leader said at a press conference.
PRP has two MLAs from Telangana region; Maheshwar Reddy from Nirmal in Adilabad district and Anil from Balkonda in Nizamabad district. Chiru is obviously referring to both or one of them.”How they could give such assurances is something we don’t understand,” Chiru said in dismay.
While this is the latest alleged instance of a secret pact between Jagan and KCR, it has been public knowledge that the two parties never crossed paths nor targeted the other politically in the last many months.
While KCR and his party treat TDP as enemy number one, followed by selective criticism of Congress leadership, they never touched Jagan with a barge pole dispite the fact that YSR Congress Party’s position on the issue of division is no different from that of Chandrababu Naidu.
After the Manukota incident in which Jagan was not allowed to land in Telangana, lot of water seems to have flowed under the political bridge for these parties.
Observers say that clearly there is some kind of tacit understanding between KCR and Jagan for mutual political benefit. One will not step on to the other’s political turf, as both believe that they are ahead of others in their respective regions.
Politics does indeed make strange bed fellows, and the immediate political exigencies seem to have led to a truce – some allege a nexus – between the two parties. How long will this distance love affair continues is anybody’s guess.

Tuesday, 6 December 2011

Naidu's no-confidence strenghtens Jagan

The no-confidence motion moved by the Telugu Desam Party against the Kiran Kumar Reddy government in the state has been defeated as expected, without giving scope for any miracles.
But one wonders what the TDP has achieved by moving the motion.
On Monday morning itself, the TDP leaders were found commenting during the television debates that there was way the no-confidence motion would win because the ruling party obviously had the majority in the House.
“The chances of no-confidence motion winning are more only if the difference between the number of ruling party MLAs and that of the opposition is very thin; or if a big group of the ruling party breaks away to form another splinter group,” observed former TDP minister Kodela Sivaprasada Rao.
Then why did the TDP go ahead with the no-confidence motion and what did it achieve? The answer is nothing. If wants to test the strength of the Jagan group MLAs, then one wonders how does it benefit Naidu?
On the other hand, if they are disqualified and by-elections are held, there is no way the TDP will benefit out of it because it has little chances of winning those seats. Even if the Kiran Kumar Reddy government lost the trust vote resulting in mid-term elections, it would not have helped the TDP at all, as the party absolutely no chances in the Telangana region.
So, Naidu only messed up the state political scenario. In a way, he has helped YSR Contgress party president Y S Jaganmohan Reddy to strengthen further.

Kiran survives, Jagan proves point


The opposition sponsored no-confidence motion against the Congress government in Andhra Pradesh was defeated by a huge margin in the state assembly late Monday night.
After over a 16-hour-long debate on the motion moved by Telugu Desam Party (TDP), the house voted on the motion after 1 a.m. While 122 members supported the motion, 160 opposed it and there was one neutral. Five members were absent during the voting.
Though 16 Congress legislators loyal to YSR Congress party leader Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy violated the whip to vote in favour of the motion, it was not enough to defeat the government.
The ruling party has 153 members in 295-member house. The magic figure required to defeat the motion was 143 as there are seven vacancies in the house.
In addition to ruling party's 136 members, 17 out of 18 legislators of Praja Rajyam Party (PRP) and all seven members of Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM) opposed the motion.
All 85 members of TDP, 12 of Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS), four of CPI, two of BJP, one each of CPI-M, YSR Congress party and independent voted for the motion.
Though YSR Congress party's honorary president Vijayamma had reached the assembly in the morning with 18 Congress rebels, the number dwindled to 16 by the time of the voting. Suspense over the actual strength of Jagan group continued till the last minute as Congress leaders made all out efforts to win back rebels.
Announcing the defeat of the motion, Speaker N. Manohar adjourned the house sine die.
On the last day of the five-day winter session, the house debated the motion for over 16 hours. The debate was marred by not just heated exchanges between treasury and opposition benches but also by the allegations and counter allegations among the parties supporting the motion.
If the final result at the no-confidence vote was to be taken into account, the Congress has only 137 members whereas the combined Opposition strength was 122.
“If one were to take out the combined strength of PRP and MIM (24 MLAs) and add it to the Opposition tally, it would almost reach the magical 150-mark which is sufficient to unseat the Kiran government. It was a close shave for the CM. Despite his bravado, the CM must be feeling the jitters,” a senior analyst pointed out.

We won't be sacked:Jagan MLAs' confident

The Congress MLAs owing allegiance to YSR Congress party president Y S Jaganmohan Reddy till now seem to be confident that they would not be disqualified from the Congress party even if they vote against the Kiran Kumar Reddy government in the no-confidence motion.
According to the indications available so far, at least a dozen MLAs would vote for the no-confidence motion moved by Telugu Desam Party in the assembly.
They are of the view that the Congress would not dare to issue a disqualification notice against them because it would result in dwindling of its numbers in the assembly and would make its position precarious. In the event of they being disqualified, there is every possibility that the YSR Congress would back all the seats and thus, the Congress strength would come down by their number.
“Hence, even if they vote against the government, the Congress party would bear it with humiliation and would not seek their disqualification because technically, they still remain the Congress MLAs,” a political observer said.
To avoid such an embarrassing situation, the Speaker might even conduct a voice vote on the no-confidence motion and say that the no-trust motion was lost. That would help the Congress to claim that all the pro-Jagan MLAs had voted for the government. It would save the face of both the Congress as well as Jaganmohan Reddy. In a way, it will also be a blessing in disguise for the TDP, since it might not be willing to contest the by-elections in the disqualified pro-Jagan MLAs’ constituencies.

Monday, 5 December 2011

Vijayamma makes impressive maiden speech

YSR’s wife and YSR Congress Party’s sole MLA in the Assembly Vijayamma made her maiden speech in the Assembly during the debate on no-confidence motion and she made an emotional impact. Her speech was halting most of the time, but she overcame the initial hesitation a couple of minutes through the speech.
Her 16-mintue speech contained all important points she wanted to make. She reminisced fondly about her husband, pointed out the irony of the situation when she had to speak in an Assembly without YSR’s presence. She pointed out how both Congress and TDP made critical references to her late husband.
Reminding that the present government owed its existence to YSR’s hardwork, she said it was a quirk of fate that she had to vote against the same government. She also talked about how YSR worked all through his life for Congress Party and single-handedly brought it into power in the state.
She also took potshots on TDP and Chandrababu Naidu, sarcastically saying that she failed to understand whether the no-confidence was against YSR or for farmers.
Most importantly, she declared that her party as well as those who continued to be loyal towards YSR would vote for the no-confidence, whatever the motives of TDP were. She congratulated the MLAs loyal to YSR who were going to vote against Congress, even though they were aware that they might face disqualification.
She also felt that had TDP moved the confidence resolution six months earlier when Chiranjeevi had not merged his PRP with Congress, the government would have fallen.
On the whole, Vijayamma’s speech made an impact on the House, which listened to her raptly. Probably worried over the message her speech would send to the people at large, PCC Chief Botsa Satyanarayna was on his feet to clarify that Jagan deserted Congress on his own. Jagan wanted dynastic rule in the state and claimed CM’s seat as a matter of hereditary right, which was not possible in Congress, he said.
Botsa also pointed out, rather cryptically, that it was Kiran Kumar Reddy who defended Jagan when TDP charged YSR’s son with the murder of Paritala Ravi.
Vijayamma again rose to clarify that Jagan had to come out of Congress because the party did not give permission for his ‘Odarpu Yatra’. It was only towards the end of her speech that Jagan loyalists like Balineni rushed to her help.

MLAs got richer overnight

The no-confidence motion introduced by the Telugu Desam Party in the state assembly has turned out to be an excellent opportunity to many MLAs from various parties to reap rich benefits.
It was a sort of windfall for the Praja Rajyam Party MLAs, as the Congress high command has assured them to take care of all their interests besides reportedly handing over “suitcases” to them.
On the other hand, several Congress MLAs in the camp of YSR Congress party president Y S Jaganmohan Reddy, too, have been lured back into the Congress with monetary and other benefits.
The Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul-Muslimeen (MIM) also rightly used the opportunity to blackmail the Congress party and got the Hyderabad Mayor seat for the next three years, instead of just two years, as a sort of gift for saving the Kiran government.
At the same time, the Congress party has also managed to silence its rebels like Komatireddy Venkat Reddy and P Shankar Rao to vote for the Kiran government, though they are bitter critics of him.
It is yet to be known what “settlement” they had reached to vote for the Chief Minister. The Congress leaders are also allegedly “managed” Telangana Rashtra Samithi MLA Ch Ramesh to stay back in Germany in the name of flight problems.
Unfortunately, only the TDP legislators could not get anything in the bargain. “We are moving the no-trust motion and you are getting the benefits,” a TDP legislator commented with a rebel Congress MLA in the assembly.

Relation between YSR Cong and BSR Cong


Notwithstanding repeated denials by YSR Congress party president Y S Jaganmohan Reddy that there was absolutely no connection whatsoever with mining baron and former Karnataka minister Gali Janardhan Reddy, there is a talk among the people that there is certainly some connection between the two.
The first instance that confirmed the suspicion came in the form of the election symbol – “fan” chosen by Janardhan Reddy’s close aide B Sriramulu in the just concluded by-elections to Bellary assembly seat.
Sriramulu contested as an independent on this symbol, which clicked in the constituency largely dominated by Telugu population and he won the seat with a massive mandate. It is not a mere coincidence that ceiling fan happens to be the symbol of the YSR Congress party in the recent by-elections to Kadapa Lok Sabha seat and Pulivendula assembly seat.
And in all probability, Jagan party would retain its symbol in the coming days.
The second point that further confirmed the link between Jagan and Janardhan Reddy is that the new party to be floated by the latter in Karnataka is being named as “BSR Congress.” It was disclosed by Sriramulu himself. While everybody thinks BSR stands for B Sriramulu, he expanded it further saying BSR Congress stands for: Badavara (of the poor), Shramikara (of the working class) and Raitara (of farmers) Congress. It more or less resembles the YSR Congress party of Jaganmohan Reddy, in which Y stands for Yuvajana, S for Shramika and R for Rythu.
Is it not enough to suspect that there is something between Jagan and Janardhan Reddy?

Will Jagan serve a surprise punch?

The ruling Congress seems to be confident of getting through the no-confidence motion today without much of a hitch. Despite all the jockeying by various parties, the numbers still seem to favour Kiran Kumar Reddy government.
The ruling combine commands 162 MLAs on its side, while the opposition could muster only 124 MLAs as of now. The PRP threat passed off as a storm in a cup and the less than convincing attempt of TRS to provoke T Congress MLAs to vote against the government failed miserably.
The MIM, after the understanding reached over Hyderabad Mayor post, is all set to support the government.
Jagan is still making last ditch efforts to throw a surprise by continually talking to his group MLAs, many of whom have already declared their vote to the Congress Party. His reported attempts at luring some T Congress MLAs yielded little result.
While Kiran’s government is under no threat of losing on the floor, the no-confidence is still generating lot of interest because of any unexpected developments in the Jagan camp. Even if a few Jagan MLAs vote for the motion, it would indeed trigger important political developments in the state, as by-polls would be necessitated, and Jagan’s YSR Congress will have an opportunity to prove its mettle in the electoral arena.
It is also to be seen who Lok Satta Jayaprakash Narayan, Associate Member Somarapu Satyanarayana (issued a Congress whip and Sobha Nagireddy (earlier PRP and now a Jagan loyalist) will vote for.

Sunday, 4 December 2011

Congress, TDP, TRS whip MLAs

The ruling Congress and the opposition Telugu Desam Party (TDP) and Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) Sunday issued whips to their legislators on the opposition's no-confidence motion in the assembly.
While Congress directed all its 153 members in the 295-member house to vote against the TDP's no-confidence motion, the main opposition party asked its 86 legislators to back the motion when it comes up for voting Monday. TRS also asked all its 12 MLAs to be present in the house and vote for the motion.
Praja Rajyam Party (PRP) has not yet issued a whip to its lawmakers, keeping the Congress on its toes amid continuing uncertainty over the fate of the no-confidence motion.
PRP chief K. Chiranjeevi Sunday met 17 legislators of his party, who openly voiced unhappiness over being sidelined by the Congress even after the merger.
Since PRP remains a separate block in the assembly pending disposal of a petition in court by a PRP legislator challenging the merger, Chiranjeevi will have to issue a whip to ensure that all the legislators vote against the motion.
Unhappy over the delay in accommodating them in the state cabinet and other posts, the PRP MLAs are mounting pressure for their pound of flesh to bail-out the government.
Chiranjeevi briefed the MLAs about the assurance given by central Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad to him last night. However, the meeting could not take a decision on issuing a whip as some leaders wanted that they be allowed to vote according to their conscience.
Meanwhile, YSR Congress party chief Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy is holding a crucial meeting with Congress legislators loyal to him to take a final decision on his strategy. Twenty-one legislators, who met him Saturday, said they were ready to vote against the government and face by-elections if they were disqualified for violating party whip.
Two other loyalists opposed Jagan's decision to vote against the government and walked out of Saturday's meeting.
As many as 26 Congress rebels had switched loyalties to Jagan in August but some of them have since returned to the party fold.
Congress leaders including ministers met some of Jagan loyalists and handed them the party whip.
The ruling party is confident of defeating the motion with the support of PRP and its ally Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM), which has seven members.
PRP has 18 members in assembly but one of them Shoba Nagi Reddy is sailing with Jagan.
As there are seven vacancies in 295-member house (including a nominated member), Congress needs 144 votes to defeat the motion. The ruling party is sure of garnering 157 votes even if 21 rebels vote against it.
The parties which are in support of motion include CPI (4), BJP (2), CPI-M, Lok Satta and YSR Congress one each and one independent.

Its Jagan behind PRP MLAs revolt!!


The sudden heat generated in megastar-politician Chiranjeevi camp on the day the Opposition parties were gearing up for no-confidence motion against the Kiran Kumar Reddy government has raised many eyebrows in the political circles.
Though it is initially believed that Pradesh Congress Committee president Botsa Satyanarayana had instigated the yet-to-be wound up Praja Rajyam Party MLAs to pull down the Kiran government, reliable sources tell a different story.
Many of the MLAs in the Chiranjeevi camp were in touch with YSR Congress party president Y S Jaganmohan Reddy and had given them promise to pull down the Kiran government at the right time. They are not happy with the way the Chief Minister was ignoring them and the Congress party leaders in their respective constituencies ill-treating them.
However, Chiranjeevi, a political novice that he is, was of the view that all his MLAs would listen to his words. So, when he had a meeting of the MLAs at his chambers in the assembly, they all pulled him up for not taking up their cause with the Congress high command.
“You have ensured your own political future; you may get the union cabinet berth sooner or later. But, what about us? We have not got even corporation chairperson posts, leave alone cabinet berths in the state. We don’t even know whether we get the Congress tickets in the next elections and even if some us will get, we don’t know whether we will get support of the local Congress leaders. Instead, it is better to go the Jaganmohan Reddy camp. At least there, we will get some recognition and he would ensure our victory,” the MLAs are learnt to have told Chiranjeevi.
The megastar was taken aback with the revolt and it was only after that he had leaked to the media about the disgruntlement among his group MLAs. And Botsa had to personally intervene and pacify him.
Later in the evening, AICC general secretary Ghulam Nabi Azad spoke to him and asked him to pacify his group MLAs. He assured to take care of the interests of the PRP legislators.

FDI(Family Direct Investment) approved


The noisy Indian democracy has scripted a silent revolution. The politicians have arrived at a consensus on FDI policy. That is Family Direct Investment. Top hierarchy of political parties can have 100 percent FDI, allowing for hereditary route to the coveted organizational positions.
Unlike its economic counterpart, where 51 percent Foreign Direct Investment proposal in multi-brand retail met with stiff resistance, the political FDI policy was widely welcomed. “In fact, there are no reforms involved here. It is essentially the reaffirmation of faith in the long cherished value system of respecting the dynastic rights of ruling families,” a Congress spokesman said.
Both the national leaders and the regional chieftains were equally excited about the prospect of giving the long-held tradition a legal and constitutional framework. According to the policy draft, cleared by the union cabinet, the sons and sons-in-law of the incumbent party chiefs will have birthright over the post which cannot be challenged in any court of law. The word “sons-in-law” was included in the definition of the family to please the southern satrap and TDP chief N Chandrababu Naidu.
The political observers were quick to point out that this FDI policy was a masterstroke by the UPA leadership to get its sulking allies on board. “The DMK, NCP, RLD and MIM have extended their whole-hearted support to the policy. Even the potential allies like Samajwadi Party and RJD have pledged their support to us off the record,” the spokesman said.
Even some of the NDA allies like Shiv Sena and Shiromani Akali Dal and those in the no-man’s land like JD (S) and BJD were willing to cross over to UPA camp for upholding the great Indian family values. The development has also brightened the prospect of home-coming for YSR Congress President Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy who had walked out of the parent party for not applying the established family traditions in his case.
Asked about the “party with a difference” whose tallest bachelor leader has not named his heir apparent, the Congress spokesman quipped “For them, family means Parivar. Sangh Parivar, that is. So, it is the Sangh that decides the successor.” Similarly, the “ideological parents” from the foreign soil will guide the destiny of Indian communist parties, he reasoned.
While allowing 100 percent FDI in the top echelons of the party apparatus, the new policy, however, stipulates that 30 percent of the menial jobs like mobilizing donations and managing the voters must be sourced to the locally available small and medium thugs.

Saturday, 3 December 2011

High drama in Andhra politics

The last 24 hours have witnessed a rapid change in the political equations in the state.
At a time when Chief Minister N Kiran Kumar Reddy was confident that majority of the party MLAs hitherto supporting YSR Congress party president Y S Jaganmohan Reddy are back in the Congress party and would support his government in the no-confidence motion, they gave him a rude shock by attending Jagan’s meeting and declaring that they would support the no-confidence motion.
And when he thought the MLAs from Praja Rajyam Party would also support his government, they, too, gave the Chief Minister a rude shock by expressing their resentment against him for ignoring them all these days and virtually blackmailing him that his survival depends on their support.
And the Telugu Desam Party which was struggling to keep its flock together received a pleasant surprise. Three rebel MLAs – K Hareeshwar Reddy, S Venugopala Chary and Y Balanagi Reddy, who were suspended from the party for revolting against party president N Chandrababu Naidu, expressed their willingness to come back into the party. And Naidu, who discussed it with his senior party leaders, gave them a green signal.
The only TDP rebel left out now is Nagam Janardhan Reddy, who not only lost his MLA seat, but also became a loner; as two others Jogu Ramanna and Gampa Goverdhan joined the Telangana Rashtra Samithi got their political future secure. It remains to be seen whether Nagam also will come back to the TDP or not.

Telangana: A distant dream

In October, everything had come to a standstill in Telangana as the movement for a separate state for this underdeveloped region of Andhra Pradesh was at its peak and it looked like the central government would yield to pressure tactics. A month later, all the guns appear to have fallen silent.

A few days before the second anniversary of the central government's announcement Dec 9, 2009, to initiate the process for carving out a Telangana state, the dream of a separate state still looks like a distant one. Political parties are fighting for one-upmanship and appearing more interested in pushing the issue to the 2014 elections for reaping the benefits.

After government employees and mine and transport workers called off their 42-day-long strike Oct 24, the movement virtually disappeared from the streets in the region comprising 10 districts, including Hyderabad, and is now confined to the legislature and political circles.

With the region's political and non-political groups in total disarray and frequent strikes alienating people, it is not surprising that the central government too has developed cold feet over the issue and is even dropping hints that a separate state will not be a reality, at least in the near future.

Even the protest in parliament by Congress MPs from Telangana and two MPs of the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) has been drowned in the din over foreign equity in the retail sector.

With the political leadership losing credibility among the Telangana people for setting frequent deadlines without achieving anything, a sense of frustration has engulfed youth and students, which is reflected in their suicides.

The mass strike saw the Telangana movement reach its highest peak since TRS revived it a decade ago, but going by the present public mood, it looks unlikely if any political party can give it a new lease of life in the near future.

Even the Telangana Joint Action Committee (JAC), comprising TRS, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and some other groups, appears to have given up, as it dropped its grandiose plans to hold a million-man march on the lines of protests in Egypt.

TRS chief K. Chandrasekhara Rao, whose 11-day hunger strike had forced the central government to make the Dec 9, 2009, announcement, is also having second thoughts on carrying out his threat of another "fast-unto-death".

TRS critics blame it for the present situation, saying it is only interested in furthering its own political agenda.

"It was never a people's movement but a movement led by a political party which has a shortsighted agenda," P.L. Visweswara Rao, chairman of the Telangana Intellectual Forum, told IANS.

"A people's movement is one in which all sections of people and all castes participate. The present movement is being run by some upper caste people," said Visweswara Rao, a former head of the journalism department at Osmania University.

As a student of the same university, he had participated in the 1969 movement. "That was a real people's movement," Rao recalled

Both political and non-political critics of TRS feel the party is only interested in strengthening itself as proved by five legislators - three of the Congress and two of the TDP - joining its ranks.

"TRS has no credibility. It says it is opposed to Polavaram, but gets a contract for the same," said Visweswara Rao in an obvious reference to the allegation that a company which invested in a daily owned by the TRS chief bagged the contract for the irrigation project in the Andhra region.

Visweswara Rao believes a people's movement has to be transparent. "People want to know why the indefinite strike was called off and what deal led to the JAC suddenly withdrawing the strike," he said.

He, along with veteran freedom fighter Konda Lakshman Bapuji and other Telangana protagonists, is now trying to build the people's movement by bringing all the groups together.

He claims it would be an ideological platform with a common agenda of achieving the Telangana state.

They acknowledge that it would be an arduous task, given the serious differences among dozens of groups and the fact that all the three major parties - TRS, the Congress and the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) - are not willing to share a platform

Don't play games with me: Jagan


The number of MLAs supporting YSR Congress party president Y S Jaganmohan Reddy seems to be fluctuating with every passing day and passing hour.
On Saturday afternoon, the Jagan camp has leaked to the media that as many as 23 MLAs attended an emegency meeting convened by Jagan at his residence. But after the meeting, former minister Pilli Subhash Chandra Bose told the media that all the 21 MLAs in the Jagan group had taken a unanimous stand that they would vote for the no-confidence motion in the assembly. That has created an impression that two MLAs who attended the meeting might have disagreed with the stand.
"It is not important which party has moved the no-trust motion but the farmers' issue is important. We don't mind being disqualified for violating the Congress party whip; or facing the byelections. We stand by Jagan," Bose said.
The Kadapa MP is learnt to have given a strong dose to his group MLAs. "I am not forcing any MLA to stay with me. Those who wholeheartedly support me can be with me. I will take care of their interests and their win in the by-elections, if that situation arises. Others can just get last. But don't play the double game. I don't need such people," he is learnt to have said.